{"id":101,"date":"2004-03-17T23:14:45","date_gmt":"2004-03-17T23:14:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.docbug.com\/blog\/archives\/101"},"modified":"2004-03-17T23:14:45","modified_gmt":"2004-03-17T23:14:45","slug":"caught-on-video-beats-caught-in-text","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.docbug.com\/blog\/archives\/101","title":{"rendered":"“Caught on Video” beats “Caught in Text”"},"content":{"rendered":"

Oh dear. The whole “did the Bush administration use the word imminent<\/em>” question has been debated for several months now, but seeing it come across in video is much more powerful. Compare and contrast this excerpt<\/a> from Center for American Progress<\/a> and this new ad<\/a> from MoveOn.org<\/a> that excerpts last Sunday’s Face The Nation<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Text Snippet from CAP<\/a><\/th>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
\n

The Bush Administration is now saying it never told the public that Iraq was an “imminent” threat, and therefore it should be absolved for overstating the case for war and misleading the American people about Iraq’s WMD. Just this week, White House spokesman Scott McClellan lashed out at critics saying “Some in the media have chosen to use the word ‘imminent’. Those were not words we used.” But a closer look at the record shows that McClellan himself and others did use the phrase “imminent threat” \u2014 while also using the synonymous phrases “mortal threat,” “urgent threat,” “immediate threat”, “serious and mounting threat”, “unique threat,” and claiming that Iraq was actively seeking to “strike the United States with weapons of mass destruction” \u2014 all just months after Secretary of State Colin Powell admitted that Iraq was “contained” and “threatens not the United States.” While Iraq was certainly a dangerous country, the Administration’s efforts to claim it never hyped the threat in the lead-up to war is belied by its statements.<\/p>\n

…<\/p>\n