Culture – DocBug https://www.docbug.com/blog Intelligence, media technologies, intellectual property, and the occasional politics Mon, 28 Jul 2025 04:22:33 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.2 Remembering Tom Lehrer https://www.docbug.com/blog/archives/1340 Mon, 28 Jul 2025 03:45:15 +0000 https://www.docbug.com/blog/?p=1340 I just heard Tom Lehrer died yesterday at the age of 97. I first heard of Tom Lehrer reading the lyrics to The Hunting Song in one of my Dad’s old Mad Magazines, though like many of my generation I didn’t realize he was the same guy who sang Silent E, L-Y and a bunch of other songs I had probably already heard on The Electric Company. I still remember learning all the lyrics to The Masochism Tango long before I had any idea what the word meant, subjecting all my friends to my rendition of The Irish Ballad, and lying in the way-back of a station wagon coming back from a high-school chess tournament while listening to a bootleg tape of of Tom Lehrer, Revisited (or perhaps Tom Lehrer Discovers Australia).

Tom Lehrer wasn’t just a brilliant musical satirist, he was also a mensch: a few years ago he signed over literally his entire catalog to the public domain and put the whole thing — including a music files, sheet music and lyrics — on his website at https://tomlehrersongs.com/. So download and stream to your heart’s content. Just take note of the warning at the end of Lehrer’s personal note: “THIS WEBSITE WILL BE SHUT DOWN AT SOME DATE IN THE NOT TOO DISTANT FUTURE, SO IF YOU WANT TO DOWNLOAD ANYTHING, DON’T WAIT TOO LONG.”

]]>
The three phases of personification https://www.docbug.com/blog/archives/1077 Wed, 10 May 2023 21:02:22 +0000 https://www.docbug.com/blog/?p=1077 During my brief stint at Stanford I took a Communications class from Cliff Nass, who was working on what would become The Media Equation. The class was fantastic and Cliff was a great storyteller, but I remember one story in particular about how people react to new technology. We humans, Cliff explained, have always tried to differentiate ourselves from everything else in the world. For the longest time the main competition was animals, so we told ourselves all sorts of stories about how humans were different than animals. For example, humans were special because we could understand time — we had calendars and festival days, knew when to sow and when to harvest, etc. (The fact that animals migrate and show other seasonal behavior we could explain away as simply reacting to the environment — we humans are also good at explaining things away.) So then along comes a new technology that happens to intrude on our understanding of ourselves: the clock. And when that happens we go through three phases:

  1. We personify the technology. So a clock has hands and a face. God is a watchmaker.
  2. We depersonify ourselves. People are “just” clockworks.
  3. We move on and find some new reason that we’re different from both animals and technology.

So we decide what really makes us special is that we’re able to create great works. That holds us until the industrial revolution when we get factories. So first we talk about the “arm of industry”. Then we move on to people being a mere “cog in the machine”, and Henry Ford boasting about how he can make a factory work with 2637 workers with just one leg, 670 with no legs, etc. Then we move on and decide that what really makes us special is that we’re tool users. Only then we start to discover animals use tools, so instead it’s that we can solve complex problems, like chess. Then language. Then emotion. And finally we landed on “well, they (computers and/or animals) may look like they have emotions but they don’t really,” which I guess at least has the advantage that it can’t ever be refuted.

I don’t know how historically this account really is — it was just a side anecdote in a class filled with them — but when I look at the latest gushing about ChatGPT and similar large-language models I can’t help but think we’re seeing the cycle repeat itself yet again. If so, we know what comes next.

]]>
Check out Hugo short story finalist “Unknown Number” https://www.docbug.com/blog/archives/964 Sat, 09 Apr 2022 01:06:10 +0000 https://www.docbug.com/blog/?p=964 I just learned about “Unknown Number”, a short story by Blue Neustifter that was just named as a finalist for this year’s Hugo Awards for Best Short Story. The story is told as a chat history, and was published on Twitter last summer as a series of screen shots (if you use Twitter’s default web UI don’t forget to hit “more replies” at the bottom to get the rest of the story). She’s also posted a copy on Facebook if that’s easier to read. I don’t want to spoil anything, so I’ll just say I really like how Neustifter uses a fairly standard science fiction trope to tell a really poignant story.

]]>
Thoughts on Prop 8 https://www.docbug.com/blog/archives/804 Tue, 26 May 2009 20:49:21 +0000 https://www.docbug.com/blog/archives/804 I've mixed feelings on California's State Supreme Court upholding our constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage. On the one hand it means same-sex couples have to wait still longer before being granted the basic human rights every m/f couple enjoys today in our state. On the one hand it gives us, the voters, one more chance to do the right thing by overturning this knee-jerk throwback to a previous era.

It's a sobering thought that, if my wife and I had been born into our grandparents' generation, it would have been illegal for us to be married in California, because she's Asian and I'm Caucasian. That ban was also overturned by the California Supreme Court, who in 1948 declared that our anti-miscegenation law violated the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Only that time there was no way that 52% of the voters could overturn that right simply by passing a ballot measure.

Fear and ignorance always bring out the worst in us, and the rights enshrined in a democracy's constitution are there, in part, to prevent a majority from acting on those base emotions in a way that tramples a minority. In this case, the State Supreme Court has declared that we voters need to grow up and do the right thing ourselves. I hope we do it soon.

]]>
I’ve mixed feelings on California’s State Supreme Court upholding our constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage. On the one hand it means same-sex couples have to wait still longer before being granted the basic human rights every m/f couple enjoys today in our state. On the one hand it gives us, the voters, one more chance to do the right thing by overturning this knee-jerk throwback to a previous era.

It’s a sobering thought that, if my wife and I had been born into our grandparents’ generation, it would have been illegal for us to be married in California, because she’s Asian and I’m Caucasian. That ban was also overturned by the California Supreme Court, who in 1948 declared that our anti-miscegenation law violated the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Only that time there was no way that 52% of the voters could overturn that right simply by passing a ballot measure.

Fear and ignorance always bring out the worst in us, and the rights enshrined in a democracy’s constitution are there, in part, to prevent a majority from acting on those base emotions in a way that tramples a minority. In this case, the State Supreme Court has declared that we voters need to grow up and do the right thing ourselves. I hope we do it soon.

]]>
Frankie Manning swings out https://www.docbug.com/blog/archives/800 Mon, 27 Apr 2009 19:37:50 +0000 https://www.docbug.com/blog/archives/800 Frankie Manning, one of the founding fathers of Lindy Hop and originator of the air step (aerial), died peacefully in his sleep this morning just a month before his 95th birthday. Since he came out of retirement in 1987 Frankie toured the world teaching Lindy, the original swing dance, to a whole new generation of dancers.

I had the pleasure of meeting Frankie at several of the dance workshops, camps and talks that he taught over the years. He had an incredibly infectious energy and sense of humor about life and the dancing and music he loved, which I think did much to make the swing dance community such a welcoming place to be. He will be missed.

]]>
Frankie Manning, one of the founding fathers of Lindy Hop and originator of the air step (aerial), died peacefully in his sleep this morning just a month before his 95th birthday. Since he came out of retirement in 1987 Frankie toured the world teaching Lindy, the original swing dance, to a whole new generation of dancers.

I had the pleasure of meeting Frankie at several of the dance workshops, camps and talks that he taught over the years. He had an incredibly infectious energy and sense of humor about life and the dancing and music he loved, which I think did much to make the swing dance community such a welcoming place to be. He will be missed.

]]>
Nice to know where I stand https://www.docbug.com/blog/archives/787 Fri, 14 Nov 2008 13:29:38 +0000 https://www.docbug.com/blog/archives/787 Mark Oppenheimer in Slate gives odds about what the next minority group will be to win the White House. Looks like even without those Burning Man photos floating around the Net my chances are slim:

The atheists: When the lion lies down with the lamb, when the president is a Republican Muslim and the Democratic speaker of the House is a vegan Mormon lesbian, when the secretary of defense is a Jain pacifist from the Green Party, they will all agree on one thing: atheists need not apply. A 2007 Gallup poll found that 53 percent of Americans would not vote for an atheist for president. (By contrast, only 43 percent wouldn't vote for a homosexual, and only 24 percent wouldn't vote for a Mormon.) As Ronald Lindsay, executive director of the Council for Secular Humanism, told me in an e-mail: "Atheism spells political death in this country."

Indeed. Only one current congressman has confessed to being an atheist: Rep. Pete Stark, a Democrat from the lefty East Bay region of Northern California. If he ever ran for president, he would need God's help just as surely as he wouldn't ask for it.

I suppose I can take solace that Stark happens to be my congressman. So at least I'm represented. :)

(Via Political Animal)

]]>
Mark Oppenheimer in Slate gives odds about what the next minority group will be to win the White House. Looks like even without those Burning Man photos floating around the Net my chances are slim:

The atheists: When the lion lies down with the lamb, when the president is a Republican Muslim and the Democratic speaker of the House is a vegan Mormon lesbian, when the secretary of defense is a Jain pacifist from the Green Party, they will all agree on one thing: atheists need not apply. A 2007 Gallup poll found that 53 percent of Americans would not vote for an atheist for president. (By contrast, only 43 percent wouldn’t vote for a homosexual, and only 24 percent wouldn’t vote for a Mormon.) As Ronald Lindsay, executive director of the Council for Secular Humanism, told me in an e-mail: “Atheism spells political death in this country.”

Indeed. Only one current congressman has confessed to being an atheist: Rep. Pete Stark, a Democrat from the lefty East Bay region of Northern California. If he ever ran for president, he would need God’s help just as surely as he wouldn’t ask for it.

I suppose I can take solace that Stark happens to be my congressman. So at least I’m represented. 🙂

(Via Political Animal)

]]>
When I am old… https://www.docbug.com/blog/archives/737 Fri, 04 May 2007 19:46:29 +0000 https://www.docbug.com/blog/archives/737 Seen yesterday in San Jose: a group of seven or eight women, all between 50 and 65 years old, all wearing purple with a red hat that doesn't go. And you know, they all looked fabulous :).

]]>
Seen yesterday in San Jose: a group of seven or eight women, all between 50 and 65 years old, all wearing purple with a red hat that doesn’t go. And you know, they all looked fabulous :).

]]>
Teaching kids to appreciate fake nature https://www.docbug.com/blog/archives/697 Sun, 10 Dec 2006 19:04:55 +0000 https://www.docbug.com/blog/archives/697 This just felt very wrong to me: an interactive exhibit at Portland's Forestry Museum where city kids can have the real simulated experience of planting trees... with plastic trees and plastic dirt.

plant-it-right-here.jpg plastic-plant-and-dirt.jpg
]]>
This just felt very wrong to me: an interactive exhibit at Portland’s Forestry Museum where city kids can have the real simulated experience of planting trees… with plastic trees and plastic dirt.

plant-it-right-here.jpg plastic-plant-and-dirt.jpg
]]>
Amazing photos https://www.docbug.com/blog/archives/677 Wed, 01 Nov 2006 01:17:02 +0000 https://www.docbug.com/blog/archives/677 I so want inside this photographer's head! (Thanks to Beemer for the link!)

]]>
I so want inside this photographer‘s head! (Thanks to Beemer for the link!)

]]>
The only thing we have to fear… https://www.docbug.com/blog/archives/642 Wed, 09 Aug 2006 01:02:50 +0000 https://www.docbug.com/blog/archives/642 The Cato institute has a short paper pointing out that most of the harm done by terrorism comes from our over-reaction to it (in terms of money diverted to security from more meaningful programs, additional hassle and fearful customers staying away) than the miniscule amount of damage that a terrorist attack itself delivers in terms of damage or loss of life. (For example, the paper points out that "in almost all years, the total number of people worldwide who die at the hands of international terrorists anywhere in the world is not much more than the number who drown in bathtubs in the United States."

It seems to me I've heard this idea somewhere before:

I am certain that my fellow Americans expect that on my induction into the Presidency I will address them with a candor and a decision which the present situation of our people impel. This is preeminently the time to speak the truth, the whole truth, frankly and boldly. Nor need we shrink from honestly facing conditions in our country today. This great Nation will endure as it has endured, will revive and will prosper. So, first of all, let me assert my firm belief that the only thing we have to fear is fear itself—nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror which paralyzes needed efforts to convert retreat into advance. In every dark hour of our national life a leadership of frankness and vigor has met with that understanding and support of the people themselves which is essential to victory. I am convinced that you will again give that support to leadership in these critical days.

We need words like these today as much as we did then, from the highest of offices to the local community.

(via Boing Boing via Schneier)

]]>
The Cato institute has a short paper pointing out that most of the harm done by terrorism comes from our over-reaction to it (in terms of money diverted to security from more meaningful programs, additional hassle and fearful customers staying away) than the miniscule amount of damage that a terrorist attack itself delivers in terms of damage or loss of life. (For example, the paper points out that “in almost all years, the total number of people worldwide who die at the hands of international terrorists anywhere in the world is not much more than the number who drown in bathtubs in the United States.”

It seems to me I’ve heard this idea somewhere before:

I am certain that my fellow Americans expect that on my induction into the Presidency I will address them with a candor and a decision which the present situation of our people impel. This is preeminently the time to speak the truth, the whole truth, frankly and boldly. Nor need we shrink from honestly facing conditions in our country today. This great Nation will endure as it has endured, will revive and will prosper. So, first of all, let me assert my firm belief that the only thing we have to fear is fear itself—nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror which paralyzes needed efforts to convert retreat into advance. In every dark hour of our national life a leadership of frankness and vigor has met with that understanding and support of the people themselves which is essential to victory. I am convinced that you will again give that support to leadership in these critical days.

We need words like these today as much as we did then, from the highest of offices to the local community.

(via Boing Boing via Schneier)

]]>